Leading
with a story about a “sexy rap music controversy at the University of
Miami” is awesome. All I have to say is: “sexy rap music controversy at
the University of Miami,” and possibly “scandalous mp3 available for
download.” See, you’re already hooked.
Late yesterday ESPN ran a story
about a rap recording that had surfaced “on the Web” during the day.
The recording, which spends a very long time promising a shitload of
sexual prowess “on the 7th floor,” is one of those things that should
offend just about everbody, but especially … well … everybody. Why is
it on ESPN? Well, it was reportedly made by a group of University of
Miami football players, two years ago, and some of the musicians are
apparently still on the team.
To ESPN, which threw it in the
“breaking news” box on its home page, this smells of controversy and
the decline of moral values in America. Pat Forde wrote the accompanying opinion piece,
in one of the week’s more unfortunate sportswriting gigs, saying that
“Miami football, which has made significant strides over the years to
eradicate the old image of Thug U., needed this like Doc Gooden needs
another trip to central booking.”
Hard to predict where the
story will go. More than twelve hours since ESPN reported it, the
controversy-to-be is still not getting traction on other national
sports pages. So instead of making some crass analysis about sportswriting
and moralism in America …
More interesting for our present purposes is
the question: how did the story get to Bristol? The recording was first
“released” on Kyle Munzenreider’s Miamity Blog
on Tuesday afternoon. Kyle’s a student at U-M and lives on the sixth
floor of the building whose seventh floor is obviously such a den of
ill repute (at least in its own imagination).
Deadspin, which reads all blogs – seriously, how? – went with the story
shortly thereafter. On Wednesday, some intrepid ESPN Nation chatroom
participant – Mike from Boston – asked U-M Wide Receiver Sinorice Moss
about the song (without saying anything about its subject matter), and
Deadspin ran with that as well.
In
light of the Deadspin piece, and especially in light of the eventual
ESPN story, Munzenreider’s blog has been overwhelmed, as have various
sources for internet downloads (operable as of the publication of this
piece, but get ‘em while it’s hot). The main posting is on Putfile,
though various posters to the Miamity blog have listed alternate web
hosts, and the Digest has no doubt that somewhere in P2P-land the 7th floor is already gettin’ busy.
So, before we move on, let’s just say one big hoorah for online sports journalism. As Deadspin was with the Matt Lawton steroids piece
– it’s great to trace your own involvement in bringing stories to
national attention. Everyone’s hit counters go way up, and it makes
ESPN look just a little bit more ridiculous than it already did. Which,
we have to admit, takes some doing.
Can we also ban talking about steroids?
The
morning after the morning after, there’s still some hovering talk in
the air about the MLBPA bowing to the Selig/Congress doubleteam. Now,
the Digest covered this yesterday in some detail,
but it’s worth pointing out that an additional twenty-four hours of
reflecting has made a few sportswriters more concerned about the
long-term impact of the policy.
In her morning column,
Sally Jenkins says that the steroids policy will only work on anybody
dumb enough to get caught in the first place: “[the policy is] merely a
deterrent -- and a crude one, at that. The problem is, there's little
evidence that deterrents consistently work on elite athletes, who tend
to be risk-takers by definition, and whose outlook and habits are
formed long before they sign contracts.”
In a similarly scatching column, Ray Ratto points out that Selig’s tough stance on the current list of banned substances is mostly smoke and mirrors; real
enforcement means bringing the current list up to par with more
realistic standards (the Olympic one being a starting point): “The
smart juicers are using the vast amount of undetectables that the
backstairs chemists are whipping up, and the testing for that is either
(a) expensive or (b) unavailable. It's an endless cat-and-mouse game
that will end only when some great/famous player drops dead during a
game when there's no way to hide the evidence.”
Ratto makes
the point that McCain and Bunning just simply realized they had won as
much of a political victory as they were likely to get with baseball.
So perhaps it’s no surprise that now they are moving on, turning their attention to other sports. Meanwhile, it will be interesting to see to what extent the media resonates with today’s report in The Washington Post that the new NFL CBA negotiations are stalling,
and that next season very well may be played without a salary cap. The
NFL has so long been the media’s example of how sports leagues should
be run – especially with documented league management troubles in the
NBA, MLB, and, well, that thing called the NHL, it will be curious to
see whether or not media outlets jump on the NFL-is-doomed bandwagon.
Because that whole salary cap thing, yeah, that’s big news. Big, big,
big, big news.
In Actual Sports
The Knicks
and Lakers played last night. No small amount of interest, the whole
Larry Brown v. Phil Jackson thing. In fact, it was so interesting, Tony
& Mike brought it up yesterday just to talk about how uninteresting
it was. Thanks guys.
This morning, after the Lakers’ victory, Phil Taylor at SI says that there’s no coaching genius here, just talent. That Kobe guy.
Tomorrow:
We gave the Los Angeles GM story the day off, but it’ll be back. Also:
ESPN has themselves a whole ‘nother bad boy wide receiver interview,
but let’s give them a day to overreport it before we get involved. It’s
just not fun otherwise. |